Re: The leftover Halloween candy, contested.
Sample ruling by Medieval Monarch · BantamCourt Bench
- Complaint
- My sibling has been "sorting" the leftover Halloween candy "for the household," in which I believe they mean "eating the Reese's and leaving the Smarties." They deny this. They have, however, gained four pounds since November 1st.
- Defense
- The respondent argues the Reese's were "on top" and therefore accessible under the household sorting protocol, and that Smarties, in their view, are candy "in name only." They further note the petitioner consumed the entire bag of Twix in a single sitting on Halloween night.
- Findings
- There were Reese's. There were Smarties. The sorting protocol, such as it is, does not exist in writing. The four pounds are circumstantial but not, the Court finds, irrelevant. The Twix, regrettably, also existed.
- Verdict
- Sorting protocol, written and laminated, by next Sunday; the Reese's will be split evenly, with witnesses.
- Reasoning
- A household with a candy protocol is a household at peace. The protocol shall be drawn up, signed by both parties, and posted on the refrigerator door. Future disputes shall be heard under the protocol, which the Court will adopt as binding. Twix guilt is hereby noted and not pursued.
- Harmless sentence
- Sign the protocol, split the Reese's, take a walk.
